Books based on game franchises are definitely a mixed bag, but at least they have a higher success rate compared to movies and TV shows based on video games. I suppose it's because the who written medium provides the authors a lot more leeway in making sure they capture the feel of the original game compared to the budget-conscious studios. So in this regard, I suppose I tend to expect more from such books compared to their more visually-inclined cousins in other media. I just hope I don't end up being too harsh.StarCraft remains a franchise that is near and dear to my heart. After they totally changed the gaming landscape back in 1998, I was hooked not just on the amazing gameplay but on the rich story as well. This has always been one of the reasons that Blizzard is such a succesful computer game studio - they know how to spin a great tale that really gets the players immersed in the games.
Thus the StarCraft novels have been an interesting way for me to further explore the rich universe that was created for this game. Despite my love for the series, I've come to not expect too much from these titles since they're written by many different authors and thus each brings a different perspective to things. And sometimes, they way they handle things just doesn't work for me.
As much as a lot of
There's a certain style to LGBT films that I can't quite put my finger on. We seem to embrace comedic elements since we like to be all witty and smart sounding in our dialog. But at the same time such movies tend to have serious issues they want to tackle in earnest, thus forcing a more serious tone to things. Balancing both elements is a challenge for any director even without the whole gay element to things. As much as one might argue that this shouldn't make too much of a differences, we have to admit that the LGBT genre of stories has not quite been as fully explored as others. Whether we like it or not, this remains to be relatively new grounds.
It's my birthday tomorrow, and I thought that it might be fun to review a movie that I really liked. To refine that idea further, I figured it would be more interesting to revisit a movie that I didn't expect that I'd enjoy but instead did.
It's interesting to note how more and more "
As much as adaptations make me feel a little uneasy about the increasing loss of true creativity in the movie world, they still serve some benefit to geek kind. More often than not, adaptations do allow certain genre or niche comics to gain a wider audience and get new readers to return to the source material. This is probably best seen with all the movies based on comic books and how they help even geeks like me learn about great titles that got lost in the shuffle over the years.
I'm not very good with horror movies. I've said this before and as I start this review, I have to bring it up again. And it's not that I don't like horror and thriller movies. It's really more that I know that I don't handle them well despite how much I appreciate the stories themselves. And thus the reason why I still end up watching them despite the fact they send my blood pressure through the roof almost every time.
I've recently started to formally introduce my partner to the wonderful world of Star Trek. Given the many incarnations of Trek, I knew that I had to be a bit more careful in terms of which Trek to use as an initial springboard into the universe of the 24th century. This is one of those cases when starting at the very beginning is not necessarily a good idea - the original series is a bit harder to get into compared to other Treks, at least in my opinion.
Novelizations of movies and television shows have become old hat these days. For almost any major entertainment event, you can expect a book to follow shortly thereafter (or sometimes even before). It's just how the world works and sometimes the novelizations are great while other times, well, they sort of pass but just barely.
I hate it when children's books talk down to kids and pander to stereotypes around what they can understand. Sure it's fun and all and probably somehow "safer", however doing so doens't really help children plus we totally ignore just how much they really understand.
The limited history of gay cinema has resulted in a number of cliches and tropes constantly repeated in many different LGBT films. I suppose it can't be helped -
I don't always agree with the major award-giving bodies in terms of their nominations. Sometimes I feel that they feel almost obligated certain movies because of the clout the studios throw around or just the sheer amount of resources that went into the development of a certain film. And thus it feels that not all movies are measured solely on the merits of their own worth but more the Hollywood politics behind it. Of course this is all speculation, but I think I'm coming from a sensible place in terms of why I think this way.
Cartoon to live-action movie adaptations have often resulted in near disasters in entertainment, what more when they're not even meant to be shown on the silver screen. I suppose it's because the big studios assume that kids have much lower entertainment standards and thus they can parade any hastily assembled piece of drivel and call it a movie.
As much as I've always been a huge Star Trek fan for most of my life, I haven't been particularly keen on religiously following the books. I didn't immediately realize why I stopped buying the books but given that I kept on picking up the Star Wars books in contrast, a reason for this quirk began to dawn on me.
I can't remember when I first learned how to appreciate con / caper movies, but I do admit that I do. To be fair, it's not like I absolutely love ALL of them automatically - it's just that I have a good appreciation for them that's a bit higher than for other movie genres. Maybe it started with Sneakers all those years ago or some similar movie. But that's not the point.
When I first watched the 1996 Romeo + Juliet movie (yes the one with Leo and Claire), I was pretty surprised by how much I enjoyed. I think what really got to me was how surreal yet enjoyable it was to have all these actors in a modern setting spewing out
A horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse!
The trilogy format makes so much sense in the book world. You get a start, a middle and an end. And you can follow the original
Spy movies have always been a bit hit-or-miss for me. They can be pretty fun and all but sometimes they dip into the shallower side of science fiction (or even fantasy) when they resort to ridiculous technologies that perform more of the work for the characters than they should. As much as I love technology and gadgets in general, I don't appreciate it when the writers decide to jump the shark that way.
Gay movies tend to predominantly fall in the same general category of chick flicks, with the exception that the protagonists are both guys. I know, it sounds like a horrible generalization, but you have to admit there's a certain degree of truth to this, especially when Hollywood is concerned. They tend to view the gay male population as being more feminine than anything and thus the same general movie formula should work for the gays as well. A harsh statement, but still generally true. After all, Hollywood is a business that relies on is ability to lump people together into categories and release movies targeting these demographics.